Yes, I know, it's been a while. Sorry, busy week.
What is the commonality between this and this (HT: Hewitt)? Demographics have consequences, and when aggregated, birth rates determine how goes a society. Want future generations to share your values? Have kids. They really are the future, inane songs by Ms. Houston aside.
Like music? Classical? Get teary wheneve you hear Pachabel's Canon in D Major played during a wedding? You'll love this. And, turns out the hamster's gone upgrade on us. (HT: Blogotional, the home too of this fun nugget.)
Having some blog writer's block? You can get ideas for posts at Evangelical Update (topic: Gender, Homosexuality, Celibacy--Confusion!!!), the next God or Not (topic: Evil, location: Buridan's Ass), the next Vox Apologia (topic: "In order for someone to be forgiven why must there be punishment at all?") and the next Vox Symposium (topic: "The Fear of The Lord".) Please visit the linked sites for details on submission deadlines and format.
This can't be good for anyone. Are men treated "fairly" in all matters reproductive? Certainly not; men who want to keep a child can be legally thwarted by a woman choosing an abortion, and men wanting nothing to do with a child can be thwarted by a woman seeking to keep a baby and request child support from the aforementioned male. But this lawsuit seems to me a wrongheaded way to seek redress of these grievances.
I enjoy the irreverent (warning! language and, um...crudeness issues) rantings of The Koolaid Report enough to find out which of the KAR gang I'm most like. Turns out, I'm a budding Learned Foot: